Resistance Training for Mental Health Benefits: A Comprehensive Review

Resistance Training for Mental Health Benefits: A Comprehensive Review

Mental health disorders, including depression, anxiety, stress-related conditions, and cognitive decline, affect millions worldwide, contributing to substantial personal, social, and economic burdens (WHO, 2021; Kessler et al., 2005). While pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions remain standard treatments, there is growing recognition of the critical role of lifestyle interventions, particularly physical activity, in promoting psychological well-being. Among various exercise modalities, resistance training (RT)—also referred to as strength training or weightlifting—has emerged as a powerful tool with evidence-based benefits for mental health. Unlike aerobic exercise, which primarily enhances cardiovascular fitness, resistance training improves muscular strength, endurance, and body composition, while simultaneously exerting significant psychological and neurobiological effects (Gordon et al., 2018; O’Connor et al., 2010).

Historically, resistance training was often associated exclusively with physical health and aesthetics. However, emerging research demonstrates that RT has profound effects on mood, anxiety, stress resilience, and cognitive function. The mechanisms underlying these benefits are multifactorial, encompassing hormonal modulation, neuroplasticity, psychosocial empowerment, and inflammatory regulation. This article presents a comprehensive review of resistance training for mental health, examining physiological and psychological mechanisms, clinical evidence, practical considerations, and future directions.

Understanding Resistance Training

Definition and Types of Resistance Training

Resistance training involves exercises that cause muscles to contract against external resistance, which can include free weights, machines, resistance bands, or bodyweight. Key modalities include:

  • Isotonic Exercises: Muscle length changes under constant resistance (e.g., squats, bench press).
  • Isometric Exercises: Muscle tension without length change (e.g., planks).
  • Eccentric and Concentric Training: Focused on lengthening or shortening muscle fibers under load.

Training can vary in intensity, volume, frequency, and load progression, all of which influence both physical and mental outcomes.

Physiological Adaptations

Resistance training induces numerous physiological adaptations:

  • Muscular Hypertrophy and Strength: Increases in muscle fiber size and recruitment improve functional capacity.
  • Neurological Adaptations: Enhanced motor unit activation, neuromuscular coordination, and proprioception.
  • Hormonal Responses: Acute increases in testosterone, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) support muscle adaptation and may influence mood and cognition.
  • Metabolic Improvements: Enhanced glucose metabolism, lipid profile modulation, and insulin sensitivity.

These adaptations create a biological environment conducive to improved mental health outcomes (Kraemer & Retimes, 2005; Westcott, 2012).

Mechanisms Linking Resistance Training to Mental Health

Neurobiological Mechanisms

Resistance training influences multiple neurobiological pathways:

  • Neurotransmitter Regulation: RT increases levels of serotonin, dopamine, and gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), contributing to improved mood and reduced anxiety (Gordon et al., 2018; Dishpan et al., 2006).
  • Neuroplasticity and Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF): RT elevates BDNF, promoting neuronal growth, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive resilience (Cassilhas et al., 2007; Liu-Ambrose et al., 2010).
  • Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis Modulation: Regular RT reduces cortical response to stress, enhancing stress resilience and emotional regulation (Hama et al., 2016).

Hormonal and Immune Pathways

Resistance training modulates endocrine and immune function:

  • Testosterone and Growth Hormone: Acute RT sessions transiently elevate anabolic hormones, which are associated with improved mood and reduced depressive symptoms.
  • Anti-Inflammatory Effects: RT reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-6, TNF-α), which are implicated in depression and anxiety (Schacht et al., 2016; Kelley & Kelley, 2017).

Psychosocial Mechanisms

  • Self-Efficacy and Mastery: Progression in strength and performance fosters confidence, self-esteem, and a sense of accomplishment.
  • Social Interaction: Group RT programs provide social support and reduce isolation, enhancing overall well-being.
  • Body Image and Identity: Improved physical strength and body composition positively impact self-perception and mental health.

Resistance Training and Depression

Evidence from Clinical Trials

Multiple meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate that resistance training significantly reduces depressive symptoms across diverse populations:

  • Adults with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD): RT interventions 2–3 times per week over 8–12 weeks significantly reduced depressive symptomatology compared to control groups (Gordon et al., 2018; Singh et al., 2005).
  • Older Adults: Strength training improved mood and reduced depressive episodes, particularly in populations with sarcopenia or functional limitations (Cassilhas et al., 2007; Liu-Ambrose et al., 2010).
  • Mechanisms: Mood improvement is mediated by petrochemical changes, anti-inflammatory effects, and enhanced self-efficacy.

Comparative Efficacy

RT has demonstrated efficacy comparable to aerobic exercise and psychotherapeutic interventions in alleviating depressive symptoms, particularly when tailored to individual ability and preference (Schacht et al., 2016; Kelley & Kelley, 2017).

Resistance Training and Anxiety

Resistance training can reduce both trait and state anxiety:

  • Physiological Reduction of Hyper arousal: RT lowers resting heart rate and cortical levels, reducing sympathetic over activation.
  • Petrochemical Effects: Increases in GABAergic activity and serotonin contribute to anxiolytic effects (O’Connor et al., 2010).
  • Clinical Evidence: RCTs indicate significant reductions in generalized anxiety and social anxiety scores following 6–12 weeks of structured RT (Gordon et al., 2018; Wi-Fi et al., 2008).

Resistance Training for Stress Resilience

  • RT improves stress management by enhancing HPA axis regulation, autonomic balance, and coping skills.
  • High-intensity RT may serve as a “hermetic” stressor, promoting adaptation and resilience to psychological stress (Hama et al., 2016; Kraemer & Retimes, 2005).
  • Workplace RT programs have been shown to reduce occupational stress, improve mood, and enhance productivity.

Cognitive Function and Neuroprotection

Resistance training positively impacts cognitive domains, particularly in older adults:

  • Executive Function: RT improves planning, inhibition, and working memory.
  • Memory and Attention: Strength training enhances hippocampus volume and connectivity, supporting memory retention (Liu-Ambrose et al., 2010; Cassilhas et al., 2007).
  • Neurodegenerative Disorders: RT may slow cognitive decline in mild cognitive impairment and early-stage dementia, potentially through increased BDNF and cerebral perfusion.

Practical Recommendations

  • Frequency: 2–4 RT sessions per week.
  • Intensity: Moderate to high intensity (60–85% of 1-repetition maximum).
  • Volume: 2–4 sets per exercise, 8–12 repetitions.
  • Progression: Gradual increase in resistance, complexity, or volume.
  • Program Design: Include multi-joint and large muscle group exercises; adapt to age, comorbidities, and mental health condition.

Target Populations and Accessibility

  • Older Adults: Mitigates age-related sarcopenia, improves cognition and mood.
  • Clinical Populations: Effective adjunct for MDD, anxiety disorders, PTSD, and stress-related conditions.
  • Youth and Students: Enhances resilience, self-esteem, and academic performance.
  • Workplace Programs: Reduces occupational stress, promotes mental well-being.

Challenges and Limitations

  • Adherence and Motivation: Barriers include lack of access, time, and knowledge.
  • Injury Risk: Improper technique or excessive load may cause musculoskeletal injury.
  • Clinical Integration: Need for standardized protocols in mental health settings.
  • Research Gaps: Long-term efficacy, optimal intensity, and population-specific outcomes require further investigation.

Future Directions

  • Integration of digital tools: Wearable’s, virtual coaching, and AI-driven RT programs.
  • Combined interventions: RT + mindfulness or aerobic training for synergistic benefits.
  • Personalized medicine approaches: Tailored RT programs based on genetics, neurochemistry, and psychological profile.
  • Expansion to underserved populations: Community and telehealth-based RT interventions.

Conclusion

Resistance training (RT) represents more than a method for building muscular strength and physical fitness; it is increasingly recognized as a comprehensive intervention for mental health, offering a wide spectrum of psychological and cognitive benefits across diverse populations. Evidence from decades of research indicates that engaging in structured RT programs can significantly reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety, enhance stress resilience, and support cognitive function, positioning it as a versatile tool in both preventive and therapeutic mental health strategies (Gordon et al., 2018; Schacht et al., 2016; Cassilhas et al., 2007). The mechanisms underlying these benefits are complex and multifactorial, spanning neurobiological, hormonal, immune, and psychosocial domains, which collectively contribute to improvements in emotional regulation, psychological resilience, and overall well-being.

From a neurobiological perspective, RT facilitates the modulation of key neurotransmitters, including serotonin, dopamine, and gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA), which are central to mood regulation and anxiety reduction. Additionally, RT stimulates the production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a protein that supports neuronal growth, synaptic plasticity, and cognitive resilience. These neuroadaptive effects are particularly relevant for populations experiencing age-related cognitive decline, chronic stress, or mood disorders, as they provide a biological foundation for improved emotional and cognitive function (Liu-Ambrose et al., 2010; Cassilhas et al., 2007). Moreover, resistance training contributes to the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, attenuating cortical responses to stress and enhancing the body’s capacity to cope with both acute and chronic stressors.

Hormonal and immune mechanisms also play critical roles in mediating the mental health benefits of RT. Acute bouts of strength training elevate anabolic hormones such as testosterone and growth hormone, which are associated with improvements in mood, energy levels, and motivation. Concurrently, regular RT reduces systemic inflammation by lowering levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), which have been implicated in the path physiology of depression and anxiety (Schacht et al., 2016; Kelley & Kelley, 2017). These biochemical changes foster an internal environment conducive to mental and physical resilience, providing both immediate and cumulative benefits.

Beyond physiological adaptations, psychosocial mechanisms significantly contribute to the therapeutic potential of RT. Mastery of progressively challenging exercises enhances self-efficacy, self-esteem, and a sense of accomplishment, while participation in group-based training can offer social support, reduce feelings of isolation, and promote a sense of community. Improvements in body image and functional capacity further reinforce positive self-perception, which is particularly beneficial for individuals struggling with mood disorders or low self-confidence. The structured nature of RT, with measurable progression and goal setting, fosters a sense of purpose and personal agency, which are key determinants of psychological well-being.

Despite its compelling benefits, challenges remain in the widespread adoption of RT as a mental health intervention. Barriers such as adherence, accessibility, and safe implementation can limit engagement, particularly in clinical or underserved populations. Integrating RT into standard mental health care requires careful consideration of individualized needs, supervision, and appropriate progression to ensure safety and effectiveness. Additionally, ongoing research is essential to clarify optimal protocols, including frequency, intensity, volume, and duration, as well as to explore long-term outcomes across different demographic and clinical populations (Gordon et al., 2018; O’Connor et al., 2010).

Looking forward, the integration of RT into public health strategies, clinical guidelines, and personalized wellness programs offers a scalable, low-risk, and highly effective approach to enhancing mental health across the lifespan. Technological innovations, including virtual coaching, wearable tracking, and AI-driven personalized programs, are likely to further enhance accessibility, adherence, and engagement. By bridging biological, psychological, and social dimensions of health, resistance training emerges not merely as a physical exercise modality, but as a holistic, evidence-based therapeutic tool capable of transforming mental health care, fostering resilience, and improving quality of life for individuals across diverse ages and backgrounds. As society increasingly prioritizes preventive and integrative health strategies, RT stands poised to become a cornerstone in the promotion of mental wellness, bridging the gap between physical activity and psychological health in a meaningful and enduring way.

SOURCES

World Health Organization (WHO, 2021). Mental Health: Global Perspective. WHO Press?

Kessler, R. C., et al. (2005). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62(6), 593–602.

Gordon, B. R., et al. (2018). Resistance exercise training for anxiety and depression: A review of the literature and recommendations for future research. Sports Medicine, 48, 1089–1109.

O’Connor, P. J., et al. (2010). Exercise and mental health: Anxiety, depression, and mood. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 3, 10–20.

Cassilhas, R. C., et al. (2007). Effects of resistance exercise on cognitive function in elderly individuals. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 40(5), 1117–1125.

Liu-Ambrose, T., et al. (2010). Resistance training and executive functions: A review. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 18(4), 464–476.

Kraemer, W. J., & Retimes, N. A. (2005). Fundamentals of resistance training: Progression and exercise prescription. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 36(4), 674–688.

Westcott, W. L. (2012). Resistance training is medicine: Effects of strength training on health. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 11(4), 209–216.

Dishpan, R. K., et al. (2006). *

Neurobiology of exercise*. Obesity, 14(3), 345–356.

Schacht, F. B., et al. (2016). Exercise as a treatment for depression: A meta-analysis adjusting for publication bias. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 77, 42–51.

Singh, N. A., et al. (2005). Exercise and depression in elderly individuals: Randomized controlled trial. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 39, 648–655.

Hama, M., et al. (2016). High-intensity resistance training and stress response. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 15(3), 453–461.

Kelley, G. A., & Kelley, K. S. (2017). Resistance exercise and depressive symptoms: Meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 99, 1–10.

WHO, (2010). Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. WHO Press?

O’Neal, J. R., et al. (2017). Strength training interventions and mental health outcomes: Review. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 13, 42–49.

de Oliveira, R. J., et al. (2013). Resistance training and anxiety: A systematic review. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 9, 15–23.

Gordon, B. R., et al. (2017). Acute and chronic effects of resistance exercise on mood. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1102.

Stanton, R., & Raeburn, P. (2014). Exercise and mental health: Resistance training for depression. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 13, 242–248.

Liu-Ambrose, T., et al. (2012). Resistance training and cognitive function in older adults: RCT. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60(3), 491–499.

Basso, J. C., & Suzuki, W. A. (2017). The effects of acute and chronic exercise on cognition. Progress in Brain Research, 225, 179–222.

Vancampfort, D., et al. (2017). Exercise interventions in depression: Evidence-based recommendations. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 23, 87–96.

Retorts, C. D., et al. (2009). Exercise interventions for depression: Meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36, 361–368.

Ekkekakis, P., et al. (2011). Exercise and mental health: Affect and adherence. Mental Health and Physical Activity, 4(1), 5–15.

HISTORY

Current Version
Sep 8, 2025

Written By:
ASIFA