Reading Time: 17 minutes

Introduction

We live in an era of unprecedented connection, where the digital world offers a boundless landscape of information, communication, and entertainment. With a device in our pocket more powerful than the computers that guided astronauts to the moon, we can video call with someone across the globe, access the entirety of human knowledge in seconds, and manage our lives with a few taps on a screen. This technological revolution has brought immense benefits, democratizing information, fostering global communities, and creating new forms of creativity and commerce. However, this constant connectivity has come at a cost, one that we are only beginning to fully comprehend. The very tools designed to connect us are, paradoxically, fostering a sense of disconnection—from ourselves, from our physical surroundings, and from the people right in front of us. The line between our online and offline lives has become so blurred that for many, it has virtually disappeared. We check work emails at the dinner table, scroll through social media while watching a movie with family, and fall asleep to the glow of a screen. This state of perpetual partial attention, where we are never fully immersed in either realm, is creating a silent crisis of well-being. The digital world operates on a economy of attention, engineered to be endlessly engaging through variable rewards, endless scrolls, and notifications that trigger our brain’s dopamine systems. This can lead to a condition often termed “digital addiction,” characterized by an inability to control our device usage despite negative consequences. The consequences are multifaceted: they include increased rates of anxiety and depression, particularly linked to social media comparison; a degradation of our attention spans, making deep, sustained focus increasingly difficult; the erosion of real-world social skills and the deep, empathetic connections that come from face-to-face interaction; and physical ailments like digital eye strain, poor posture, and sleep disruption caused by blue light exposure. Creating a healthy online-offline balance is, therefore, not a nostalgic yearning for a simpler time, but an urgent and necessary act of self-preservation in the 21st century. It is the conscious and deliberate practice of managing our relationship with technology to ensure that it serves as a tool for enhancement, rather than a force of depletion. It is about reclaiming our agency, our attention, and our time. It is not about rejecting technology outright, which is neither practical nor desirable, but about learning to harness its power without letting it harness us. This journey requires a fundamental shift in mindset—from being passive consumers of digital content to being intentional architects of our digital lives. It involves developing a deep awareness of how our devices affect our thoughts, feelings, and behaviors, and then implementing practical, sustainable strategies to create boundaries that protect our mental, physical, and social well-being. This article will serve as a comprehensive guide to achieving this equilibrium, exploring the psychological hooks of technology, the profound value of offline experiences, and a detailed, step-by-step framework for designing a life where technology has its place, but does not hold the central role.

1. The Digital Dilemma: Understanding the Psychological Mechanics of Persuasive Technology

To effectively manage our digital lives, we must first understand the powerful forces arrayed against our willpower. The attention economy, which drives the business models of most major tech platforms, is predicated on a simple principle: the more time users spend on a platform, the more data can be collected and the more advertising revenue can be generated. To achieve this, companies employ teams of neuroscientists, psychologists, and behavioral economists to design interfaces that are irresistibly engaging. One of the most potent mechanisms is the variable reward system. Popularized by psychologist B.F. Skinner, this principle shows that rewards delivered at unpredictable intervals are far more compelling than those delivered predictably. When we pull to refresh our email or social media feed, we do not know what we will find—a meaningful message, a piece of exciting news, a funny meme, or nothing at all. This uncertainty triggers a dopamine loop in our brains, the same neurotransmitter associated with gambling and addictive behaviors. We are essentially playing a slot machine with our thumb, seeking that next hit of social validation or novel information. This makes checking our devices a compulsive habit, often performed without conscious thought. Another key design feature is the endless scroll. Traditional media had a natural end—you finished a newspaper or a book. Digital platforms, however, remove this stopping cue, creating a bottomless well of content that encourages continuous consumption. The autoplay feature on video streaming services operates on the same principle, automatically launching the next episode and eliminating the moment of conscious decision to continue watching. Notifications are another critical tool in the persuader’s arsenal. The ping, buzz, or banner is a modern-day call to action, engineered to trigger our brain’s threat-reward system. It creates a sense of social obligation and the “fear of missing out” (FOMO), pulling us out of our immediate physical reality and into the digital realm. These interruptions are not neutral; each one carries a cognitive “switching cost,” as our brain has to disengage from one task and reorient to another, leading to mental fatigue and reduced productivity. Furthermore, social media platforms are meticulously designed to exploit our innate human need for social connection and validation. The “like” counter, the heart, the retweet—these are all quantified metrics of social approval. Receiving a notification of a like or a comment provides a micro-hit of social validation, reinforcing our posting behavior and keeping us locked in a cycle of performance and feedback. Understanding these design principles is not an exercise in cynicism, but one of empowerment. It allows us to see that our struggle to look away from our screens is not solely a failure of individual willpower, but a mismatch between our ancient brain’s wiring and a hyper-sophisticated, modern environment designed to exploit it. By recognizing the slot machine in our pocket, the bottomless well of content, and the engineered social triggers, we can begin to depersonalize the challenge. We are not weak; we are up against a system designed to be undefeatable through willpower alone. This realization is the first and most crucial step toward developing a strategic defense, moving us from a position of being manipulated users to becoming informed and intentional digital citizens.

2. The Cost of Imbalance: The Mental, Physical, and Social Consequences of Hyper-Connectivity

When the scales tip too far toward the digital world, the toll on our holistic well-being is significant and well-documented. The consequences are not isolated to a single domain of life but create a cascade of negative effects that impact our minds, bodies, and relationships. Mentally, the constant state of connectivity is a recipe for chronic stress and anxiety. The barrage of notifications, emails, and news creates a background hum of low-grade panic, keeping our nervous system in a semi-permanent state of fight-or-flight. This “always-on” culture makes genuine disengagement and recovery nearly impossible. Social media, in particular, has been linked in numerous studies to increased rates of depression and anxiety, especially among younger users. The mechanism is often social comparison—the tendency to compare our own mundane, messy behind-the-scenes lives with the curated, highlight-reel lives of others. This upward comparison can foster feelings of inadequacy, envy, and a distorted perception that everyone else is living a more successful, happy, and fulfilling life. Furthermore, the nature of digital communication—often rapid, text-based, and devoid of non-verbal cues—can lead to misunderstandings and a phenomenon known as “context collapse,” where we are forced to communicate with diverse social groups simultaneously, increasing social anxiety and the pressure to perform a palatable identity. Physically, our bodies bear the direct brunt of our digital habits. The most immediate effect is on our sleep. The blue light emitted by screens suppresses the production of melatonin, the hormone responsible for regulating our sleep-wake cycle. Using devices before bed disrupts this cycle, leading to difficulty falling asleep, less restorative sleep, and next-day fatigue. This creates a vicious cycle, as a tired brain has less impulse control, making it harder to resist digital temptations the following day. Physically, we also see the rise of “text neck” and other postural problems from constantly looking down at devices, as well as digital eye strain from prolonged screen exposure, leading to headaches, blurred vision, and dry eyes. A more insidious physical cost is the sedentary lifestyle that screen time promotes, displacing time that could be spent in physical activity, which is crucial for both physical and mental health. Socially, the impact is perhaps the most paradoxical. While we have more “friends” and “followers” than ever before, evidence suggests we are experiencing rising levels of loneliness and a decline in the quality of our relationships. Digital communication lacks the richness of face-to-face interaction—the subtle inflections of voice, the body language, the shared laughter, the comforting touch. These elements are essential for building deep trust and empathy. When we are physically with someone but mentally on our device—a behavior known as “phubbing” (phone snubbing)—we send a powerful nonverbal message that the person in front of us is not valuable or interesting. This erodes the foundation of our closest relationships. The constant distraction of our devices prevents us from being fully present, which is the bedrock of meaningful connection. We may be sharing a space, but we are not sharing an experience. This fragmentation of attention means we are not truly listening, not deeply engaging, and not building the shared memories that form the glue of strong social bonds. The cost of a digital-life imbalance is, therefore, a diminished quality of life across the board—a mind that is anxious and distracted, a body that is fatigued and ailing, and a social world that feels broad but shallow.

3. The Foundation of Balance: Cultivating Self-Awareness Through Digital Audits and Mindfulness

Before any practical strategies can be effectively implemented, the journey toward a healthy online-offline balance must begin with a foundation of self-awareness. Without a clear, data-driven understanding of our current habits, any attempt at change will be based on guesswork and likely falter. The first and most powerful tool for building this awareness is the digital audit. This is a systematic process of tracking and analyzing how we actually spend our time and attention online, moving beyond subjective feelings to objective data. Most smartphones now have built-in screen time trackers that provide detailed reports on how many times a device is picked up, which applications are used most frequently, and the total time spent on each. Conducting a digital audit for a typical week can be a shocking and illuminating experience. Many people are unaware of the sheer volume of time dedicated to mindless scrolling on social media, news sites, or entertainment apps. The goal of the audit is not to induce shame, but to gather intelligence. It answers the critical question: “Where is my attention actually going?” Once the data is collected, the next step is to reflect on it without judgment. Which applications leave you feeling informed, connected, and energized? Which ones leave you feeling drained, anxious, or envious? This reflective process helps to identify the “digital drains”—the activities that extract more value from you than they provide—and the “digital nourishers”—those that genuinely add value to your life. Alongside this quantitative audit, a qualitative mindfulness practice is essential. Mindfulness, in this context, is the practice of bringing non-judgmental awareness to our impulses and behaviors around technology. It involves creating a small space between the urge to check a phone and the action of doing so. Before unlocking your screen, you can pause and ask, “What is my intention here? What specific need am I trying to meet?” Often, we reach for our devices out of boredom, anxiety, loneliness, or procrastination—as a digital pacifier. By bringing awareness to these underlying triggers, we can start to address the root cause rather than just the symptom. For example, if the trigger is boredom, perhaps the healthier response is to take a few deep breaths, look out the window, or have a brief conversation with a colleague. If the trigger is anxiety about a work project, the healthier response might be to spend two minutes jotting down the next actionable step rather than seeking distraction. This practice of “urge surfing”—observing the craving to use technology without immediately acting on it—builds the metacognitive muscle that is essential for self-regulation. It shifts our relationship with technology from one of automatic habit to one of conscious choice. This foundation of self-awareness, built through rigorous auditing and mindful reflection, provides the crucial map and compass for the journey ahead. It tells us where we are starting from and illuminates the gap between our current digital life and the one we aspire to have, empowering us to make intentional changes that are personalized and sustainable.

4. Reclaiming Your Time: Practical Strategies for Setting Digital Boundaries

Armed with the self-awareness gained from a digital audit, the next step is to implement practical, concrete boundaries that protect your time and attention. These boundaries are not about deprivation, but about creating space for the offline activities that you truly value. One of the most effective macro-level strategies is the implementation of tech-free zones and times. This involves designating specific physical areas where devices are not allowed. The most critical of these is the bedroom. By banning smartphones and other screens from the bedroom, you protect your sleep from blue light disruption and your mind from the anxiety-inducing last-minute check of emails or social media. Charging your phone overnight in another room is a powerful commitment to this boundary. Other valuable tech-free zones can include the dining table, ensuring that meals are times for genuine connection with family or friends, and perhaps the bathroom, creating small moments of respite throughout the day. On a temporal level, establishing a digital curfew—a set time in the evening after which all screens are turned off—can be transformative for winding down and preparing for restful sleep. Another powerful set of strategies involves actively managing the design of your devices and apps to reduce their persuasive pull. This is where you move from defense to offense. Begin by conducting a ruthless notification purge. Go through your phone’s settings and disable every non-essential notification. The only alerts that should break through your focus are those from real people who need your immediate attention (e.g., phone calls or specific messages from family). Everything else—social media likes, news alerts, promotional emails—can be silenced. This single action dramatically reduces the number of interruptions throughout your day, allowing for sustained focus. Next, reorganize your home screen. Remove the most addictive and time-wasting apps from the prime real estate of your first screen. Instead, relegate them to folders on a secondary screen, or even better, delete them entirely and only access them through a mobile browser, which adds a layer of friction. Fill your home screen with tools that support your intentions, such as your calendar, a notes app, a meditation app, or your music library. Utilize built-in focus modes or “Do Not Disturb” features during periods of deep work or quality personal time. For more advanced control, consider using app blockers that allow you to set strict limits on your usage of certain websites or applications during specified hours. On your computer, you can use website blockers to prevent access to distracting sites during your most productive work blocks. These technical boundaries act as a form of pre-commitment, making it harder for your future, tempted self to derail your intentions. By creating these environmental and technological guardrails, you are not relying on fleeting willpower; you are architecting your digital environment to automatically support your goals, effectively reclaiming your most precious resource: your attention.

5. The Art of Deepening Offline Engagement: Cultivating Presence and Analog Joy

Creating a healthy balance is not just about reducing screen time; it is about actively and joyfully filling the reclaimed time with meaningful offline activities. If the void left by digital abstinence is simply filled with boredom or a sense of lack, the pull back to the screen will be overwhelming. Therefore, a proactive strategy for cultivating a rich offline life is essential. This involves rediscovering the depth, texture, and satisfaction of analog experiences. One of the most profound areas to focus on is the cultivation of single-tasking and deep focus. In a world that glorifies multitasking, the act of dedicating your full attention to a single activity is a radical and restorative practice. This could be reading a physical book for an uninterrupted hour, allowing yourself to become fully immersed in the narrative without the temptation to look up a fact or check a notification. It could be engaging in a hobby that requires manual skill and concentration, such as woodworking, knitting, playing a musical instrument, or gardening. These activities engage different parts of the brain than screen-based consumption, often inducing a state of “flow”—a state of complete absorption where time seems to stand still. Flow states are not only deeply satisfying but are also crucial for psychological well-being and mastery. Another critical area is the intentional deepening of real-world social connections. This means prioritizing face-to-face interactions and giving them the attention they deserve. When meeting a friend for coffee, make a conscious pact to put phones away, on silent and out of sight. Practice active listening, giving the other person your full attention and resisting the urge to mentally compose your response or think about something else. Engage in shared activities that foster connection, such as cooking a meal together, going for a hike, or playing a board game. These shared experiences create stronger emotional bonds and more durable memories than digital exchanges. Furthermore, reconnecting with the physical world is a powerful antidote to the virtual one. Spending time in nature—a practice known in Japan as shinrin-yoku or “forest bathing”—has been scientifically proven to reduce stress, lower blood pressure, and improve mood. The sights, sounds, and smells of a natural environment provide a sensory richness that a screen cannot replicate. Simply taking a walk without any device, observing your surroundings, can be a profoundly grounding experience. Engaging your physical body through regular exercise, yoga, or dance not only counters the sedentary nature of screen time but also releases endorphins and helps to regulate stress. Finally, rediscover the joy of analog rituals. The deliberate process of brewing a cup of tea, writing in a journal with a pen, or cooking a meal from scratch are all acts that ground us in the present moment and engage our senses in a way that clicking and scrolling never can. By consciously curating a portfolio of these rich, engaging, and satisfying offline activities, we create a life that is so compelling that the digital world naturally recedes to its proper, utilitarian place. We learn that the most fulfilling connections and experiences are not found in a feed, but in the full-bodied, present-moment reality of our lives.

6. The Nuanced Approach: Balancing the Digital Dividends with the Digital Drains

A healthy online-offline balance is not a simplistic, binary war where “offline good, online bad.” Such a view is reductive and ignores the immense value that the digital world can provide. The goal is not digital minimalism for its own sake, but digital intentionalism—a nuanced approach where we consciously evaluate and curate our digital activities based on the value they add to our lives. This requires moving beyond simply tracking time spent to assessing the quality of that time. It involves making a clear distinction between what we might call “Digital Dividends” and “Digital Drains.” Digital Dividends are online activities that are purposeful, enriching, and aligned with our goals and values. This could include using video calls to maintain deep relationships with family and friends who live far away; taking an online course to develop a new professional skill; using a language learning app to work towards fluency; accessing credible news sources to stay informed; using mindfulness apps to guide a daily meditation practice; or leveraging project management tools to collaborate efficiently with a team. These activities use technology as a lever to enhance our lives, providing clear value that would be difficult or impossible to achieve offline. Conversely, Digital Drains are activities that extract more from us than they give back. This is typically passive, aimless consumption: mindlessly scrolling through social media feeds out of habit rather than intention; falling down rabbit holes of outrage-driven news or trivial entertainment; compulsively checking notifications for a hit of dopamine; or engaging in online arguments that only raise blood pressure. The key differentiator is often the state of mind we are in when we engage with the technology. Are we using it with a clear purpose, or are we being used by it to avoid discomfort or boredom? The practice of digital intentionalism involves conducting a regular cost-benefit analysis of our digital tools and habits. For each app, platform, or digital activity, we can ask: What is the specific value this brings to my life? What is the cost in terms of time, attention, and emotional energy? Does this tool serve me, or do I serve it? Based on this analysis, we can make deliberate choices. We might decide to keep a social media app but unfollow accounts that trigger comparison and anxiety, consciously curating a feed that inspires and educates. We might decide to check news only once a day from a reputable source instead of constantly refreshing a sensationalist feed. We might set a 20-minute daily timer for a particular game or entertainment app, enjoying it guilt-free within that limit. This nuanced approach allows for a flexible and personalized balance. It acknowledges that the digital world is a toolbox, and like any toolbox, it contains both powerful instruments and wasteful distractions. The skilled craftsperson does not throw away the entire toolbox; they learn to select the right tool for the right job, and to put it away when the work is done. By adopting this mindset of digital intentionalism, we move from a reactive to a proactive relationship with technology, ensuring that it remains a servant to our goals, and not the master of our time.

7. Fostering a Collective Balance: The Role of Family, Workplace, and Societal Norms

While individual responsibility is paramount, creating a truly healthy relationship with technology cannot be achieved in a vacuum. Our digital habits are profoundly shaped by the social and cultural environments we inhabit—our families, our workplaces, and broader societal norms. Therefore, fostering a collective balance is essential for making sustainable change easier and more supported. Within the family unit, establishing shared agreements and norms around technology use is crucial for protecting relationships and fostering connection. This can begin with a family meeting to collaboratively create a “family media agreement.” This agreement might outline rules such as no devices at the dinner table, a common digital curfew for all members, tech-free periods during weekends for family activities, or the expectation that devices are charged overnight in a common area rather than in bedrooms. The key is that these rules are discussed and agreed upon together, rather than imposed from the top down, fostering a sense of shared responsibility. Parents play a particularly important role as digital role models. Children are far more influenced by what they see their parents do than by what they are told to do. If a parent is constantly on their phone during family time, they implicitly communicate that the device is more important than the people present. By consciously modeling healthy boundaries—such as putting their own phone away during conversations, engaging in offline hobbies, and openly discussing their own efforts to find balance—parents can instill these values in their children from a young age. In the workplace, organizational culture plays a massive role in either perpetuating or alleviating digital burnout. A company that emails employees at all hours of the night and expects immediate responses is creating an “always-on” culture that bleeds into personal lives. Forward-thinking organizations are now implementing policies that promote digital well-being. This can include establishing clear norms about after-hours communication, such as no emails sent on weekends or using scheduling tools to deliver messages only during work hours. Leaders can encourage employees to use their vacation time fully and to disconnect completely while away. Companies can also provide training on digital productivity and focus, teaching employees how to use technology more effectively rather than being used by it. By prioritizing outcomes over online presence, workplaces can reduce digital presenteeism and foster a healthier, more productive environment. On a broader societal level, a cultural shift is underway. We are beginning to see a pushback against the glorification of “hustle culture” and a growing awareness of the mental health costs of hyper-connectivity. Public discourse is increasingly critiquing the business models of attention-harvesting platforms. This growing consciousness helps to destigmatize the act of disconnecting. When it becomes socially acceptable to not immediately reply to a message, to have an out-of-office message that genuinely means you are offline, or to openly discuss the need for a digital detox, it empowers individuals to set their own boundaries without fear of social or professional repercussion. By working on these collective fronts—within our homes, our companies, and our communities—we can create a world that supports, rather than sabotages, our individual efforts to live a balanced and present life.

Conclusion

Creating a healthy online-offline balance is one of the most defining and necessary challenges of our time. It is a continuous, dynamic practice, not a final destination to be reached. The digital world, with all its allure and utility, is not going away; its persuasive forces will only grow more sophisticated. Therefore, our response must be equally sophisticated, rooted not in fear or rejection, but in wisdom and intention. This journey begins with awareness—a clear-eyed understanding of the psychological hooks embedded in our technology and an honest audit of how they are currently shaping our lives. It proceeds with action—the implementation of practical, personal boundaries that protect our time for deep work, restorative sleep, and meaningful connection. It is sustained by enrichment—the active cultivation of a rich offline world filled with analog joys, flow states, and present-moment engagement. And it is elevated by a nuanced mindset—digital intentionalism—that allows us to harness the profound dividends of technology while consciously avoiding its draining traps. This is not a solitary pursuit. It is a collective endeavor that benefits from shared family agreements, supportive workplace policies, and a shifting cultural narrative that values depth over distraction and presence over performance. The goal of this balance is not to live a life devoid of technology, but to live a life where technology serves as a powerful tool for enhancing human experience, rather than replacing it. It is about reclaiming our agency, our attention, and our most irreplaceable resource: our time. By doing so, we invest in the quality of our relationships, the clarity of our minds, the health of our bodies, and the depth of our engagement with the wondrous, tangible world around us. In the end, a healthy online-offline balance is the foundation for a life of purpose, connection, and genuine well-being in the 21st century.

Sources

American Psychological Association. (2020). Stress in America™ 2020: A national mental health crisis.

Bayer, J. B., Campbell, S. W., & Ling, R. (2016). The connection between mobile media habits and the perceived need for constant connection. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1519–1535.

Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. W. W. Norton & Company.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.

Eyal, N. (2014). Hooked: How to build habit-forming products. Portfolio/Penguin.

Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., Karney, B. R., Reis, H. T., & Sprecher, S. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(1), 3–66.

Houghton, D., Pressey, A., & Istanbulluoglu, D. (2020). Who needs social networking? An empirical enquiry into the capability of Facebook to meet human needs and satisfaction with life. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106153.

Kardaras, N. (2016). Glow kids: How screen addiction is hijacking our kids—and how to break the trance. St. Martin’s Press.

Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 311.

Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Barnes, C. M. (2014). Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124(1), 11–23.

Levitin, D. J. (2014). The organized mind: Thinking straight in the age of information overload. Dutton.

Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016). How has the Internet reshaped human cognition? The Neuroscientist, 22(5), 506–520.

Mark, G., Gudith, D., & Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 107–110.

McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well-being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98.

Newport, C. (2019). Digital minimalism: Choosing a focused life in a noisy world. Portfolio/Penguin.

Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 15583–15587.

Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Kasetani, T., Kagawa, T., & Miyazaki, Y. (2010). The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing): Evidence from field experiments in 24 forests across Japan. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 15(1), 18–26.

Przybylski, A. K., & Weinstein, N. (2017). A large-scale test of the goldilocks hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, 28(2), 204–215.

Turkle, S. (2017). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other (3rd ed.). Basic Books.

Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood—and what that means for the rest of us. Atria Books.

Vorderer, P., Krömer, N., & Schneider, F. M. (2016). Permanently online–permanently connected: Explorations into university students’ use of social media and mobile smart devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 694–703.

Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154.

HISTORY

Current Version
NOV, 25, 2025

Written By
BARIRA MEHMOOD

Categories: Articles

0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *